Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 28, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 27, 2003, which denied the motion of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) to dismiss the complaint in this putative class action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant MetLife dismissing the complaint.
On or about January 30, 2002, plaintiff Neil Goldman applied for a term life insurance policy from MetLife and expressly selected a so-called “cash on delivery” (C.O.D.) method of payment.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- P.T. Bank Central Asia v. ABN AMRO Bank N.V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Katz v. American Mayflower Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kesselman v. Lever House RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- B & A Demolition & Removal, Inc. v. Markel InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013