Legal Opinion
Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Yeargain
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from McDonald Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry Clay Pepper j Judge. (1) That the only issue presented upon the allegations of the petition was left undisposed of, as the verdict of the jury and the judgment thereon entered only disposed of the issues raised upon the counterclaim. (2) The verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
On February 12, 1898, the defendant gave to plaintiff the following written order:
“Southwest City, Mo., 2-12, 1898 (290).
“Plymouth Cordage Company, North Plymouth, Mass.:
“I hereby purchase from you the binding twine described below, which please ship me on or before as ordered, 189 — , via St. L. and S. E. and K. C. P. and G. B. B., viz.:
“No. bales 831. Bales 60 lbs. ea. Total pounds, 50,040. Plymouth Sisal, — (s), at 5 60-100 cts. per lb., net.
“In event of failure of crop, this order may be reduced to meet the requirements of prospective trade.
“.Deliver at Noel, Mo., for which I agree to pay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chouquette v. Southern Electric RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Pope v. RamseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- Huth v. DohleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Tower v. PauleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hackworth v. ZeitingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collier v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Nowell v. ModeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Lindsey v. NagelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Cosgrove v. StangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- State v. StamperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909