Legal Opinion
Brudenell v. Vaux
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 1, 1794PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2 U.S. 302 (____)
2 Dall. 302
BRUDENELL et al.
versus
VAUX et al.
Supreme Court of United States.
Present WILSON and PETERS, Justices.
Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.
THE question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And THE COURT, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word "months," Calendar months were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Armstrong v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1794
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guaranty Trust and Safe Deposit Co. v. Green Cove Springs and Melrose RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Armstrong v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1794
- Guaranty Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Buddington, Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Moore v. HoustonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1817
- Commonwealth v. ChambreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1794
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.