Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Rushing

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 21, 1984No. 55,039PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

Aaron Rushing appeals from the severance of his parental rights in and to his daughter, Lakesha. Our factual review is necessarily restricted to and by the matters shown by the record before us.

A petition alleging Lakesha to be a deprived child was filed on February 29 [sic], 1981. Having been born July 30, 1979, Lakesha then was nineteen months of age. A lawyer was appointed to act as attorney for Aaron. An evidentiary hearing was held on. June 2, 1981. Lakesha’s guardian ad litem, both parents, Darnella Rushing and Aaron, and both parents’ appointed attorneys appeared. The child…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Schoonover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  4. State v. TyusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. B.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. State v. T.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re RgbHawaii Supreme Court · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API