Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Steele

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2000No. NonePublished

1DissentAmundson, Justice

[¶ 23.] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 24.] I disagree with the majority’s reliance on New York v. Belton as controlling in this case. In Belton, the passenger was subject to a “lawful custodial arrest” and therefore, subject to a search incident to that arrest. See New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981). That is not the situation before this Court. In the present case, Steele was not arrested, she was merely a passenger in a vehicle where the driver was stopped for speeding and later arrested. The search of Steele’s purse was not incident to a lawful custodial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Bond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. NewsomIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API