Legal Opinion

Funkhouser v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1989No. 16120Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

A jury found Andrew Funkhouser guilty of selling cocaine, a controlled substance, in violation of § 195.200.1(4), RSMo Supp. 1984. Upon a finding that the movant, to whom we shall refer as the defendant, was both a prior and a persistent offender, the court assessed his punishment at imprison- • ment for a term of thirty (30) years. On appeal, the conviction was affirmed. State v. Funkhouser, 729 S.W.2d 43 (Mo.App.1987). Thereafter the defendant filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to *31former Rule 27.26, now repealed. Relief was denied. The defendant has appealed.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. AndersenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Franklin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Powell v. Norman Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API