North River Ins. v. Corsicana Warehouse Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellee contended upon the original hearing that appellant was not in position to attack .the trial .court’s findings of fact because no exception thereto was taken. The proposition is not well taken, and we overruled it without comment. The same' contention is reiterated in appellee’s motion for rehearing. It is now well settled by a long line of cases that:
“The judgment of the court, on trial without a jury, having been excepted to (as was done in this case) it was not necessary that exception be also taken to the conclusions of law and fact in order to secure their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Voight v. MackleTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Thompson v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Brenton & McKay v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Bond v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.