Legal Opinion
Holstein v. Federal Debt Management, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided May 25, 1995No. 01-94-00786-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
We are asked to decide two issues. First, whether the Texas or federal statute of limitations applies to an action for collection of a promissory note by an assignee of the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC). Second, whether there was diligence in requesting issuance of citation. The trial court granted summary judgment for the appellee, Federal Debt Management, Inc. (FDM), finding the appellant, Thomas Holstein, III, owed it $100,875.96. We affirm.
Fact Summary
Holstein signed a $46,052.29 promissory note to Southwestern Bank-North Belt, N.A. on September 29,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Taylor v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- U. Lawrence Boze' & Associates, P.C. and U. Lawrence Boze' v. Harris County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- James v. Gruma Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Cannon v. Texas Independent Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Johnson v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.