Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 18, 1921PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

The appellant, James Armstrong, was tried and convicted in the Fayette circuit court under an indictment charging him with the crime of robbery, the punishment inflicted by the verdict of the jury and judgment of the *219court being imprisonment of ten years in the penitentiary.

This court is asked to reverse the judgment appealed from on the following grounds assigned as error: (1) The admission by the trial court of incompetent evidence. (2) Eefusal to peremptorily instruct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. (3) Failure to properly instruct…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Breckinridge v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  4. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Blanton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. State v. WilbornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Hanks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Montgomery v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  5. Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API