Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Scott v. Taylor

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1968No. 12727, 12728Published

1Dissent

Berry, President,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in the prohibition proceeding, Case Number 12728, because I do not believe that a circuit court which is a constitutional court of general jurisdiction should be prohibited from trying a case set on its docket for trial based on the question involved in this proceeding. The plaintiff brought an action against a state agency, the Adjutant General of West Virginia and employees of the State having custody of the Armory Building at Oak Hill, West Virginia. The ad damnum clause in the complaint was for $100,000. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gable v. the Pathfinder Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Washington Luna Park Co. v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  3. Pioneer Irrigation District v. American Ditch Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Jenkins v. MontgomeryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bradford v. Kurn and LonsdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API