Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Floyd

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1923No. 15371PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Farmer

Ellen Louisa Hale Andrews filed her bill for the partition of 160 acres of land in Peoria county. The bill alleged complainant was the owner of the undivided one-half of the land, and that defendants, Samuel M. Floyd, John B. Floyd, Mary Ellen Floyd and Jane Floyd, surviving children of Arietta Steely Floyd, and Emma Floyd Mc-Cance, a child of Henry S. Floyd, deceased son of Arietta, owned the other undivided one-half. The bill also asked an accounting for the rents and profits.

The land sought to be partitioned originally belonged to Henry Steely, who resided in Pennsylvania at the time of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Busch v. HustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Compton v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wall v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Simpson v. MansonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Dunlavy v. LowrieIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Mercer v. WaymanIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Burkholder v. BurkholderIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API