Legal Opinion
Timothy R. HINKLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 24, 1997No. 97-6099PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Timothy R. Hinkle appeals from an order of the district court affirming the Commissioner’s determination that he is not entitled to disability benefits. 2 We affirm.
We review the Commissioner’s decision to determine whether his factual findings were supported by substantial evidence in light of the entire record and to determine whether he applied the correct legal standards. See Castellano v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 26 F.3d 1027, 1028 (10th Cir.1994). Substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Mary Hope CASIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- William T. WINFREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Hawkins v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Carpenter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Vicki Banks v. Larry G. Massanari, 1 Commissioner of Social Security CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Chambers v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Williamson v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Daniels v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.