Legal Opinion

People v. Piwowar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that, at the time of his escape, defendant was in custody as a *687result of an authorized arrest based on probable cause (Penal Law, § 205.00, subd 2; § 205.05; cf. People v Tedesche, 3 AD2d 220). Additionally, although the sentencing court imposed a term of 30 days’ imprisonment and three years’ probation without specifying whether the sentences are consecutive or concurrent, section 60.01 (subd 2, par [d]) of the Penal Law provides that when a sentence is imposed along with a term of probation “[t]he sentence of imprisonment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. TedescheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Boudreau v. LaPagliaNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. VacircaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API