Legal Opinion

Kwartler v. Humphreys

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

William K. Humphreys, defendant in error here, brought an action against the plaintiffs in error, Morris Kwartler, Eose Kwartler and Eose Gendelman, for damages. The action was based on misrepresentations in a real estate contract. The case was tried to the court and jury, resulting in a verdict for Humphreys for the sum of $1,200 against Morris Kwartler and Eose Gendelman ; the court, on motion, dismissing Eose Kwartler, on the ground that she had no interest in the case. Judgment was entered on the verdict, and error is prosecuted to this court.

The case grows out of a written contract for…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Albert v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API