Legal Opinion
J.I. v. New Jersey State Parole Board(076442)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 21, 2017No. A-29-15PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin
Today, the Internet plays an essential role in the daily lives of most people — in how they communicate, access news, purchase goods, seek employment, perform their jobs, enjoy entertainment, and function in countless other ways.
Sex offenders on community supervision for life (CSL) may be subject to restrictive Internet conditions at the discretion of the New Jersey State Parole Board (the Parole Board), provided the conditions promote public safety and/or the rehabilitation of the offender. In this case, the first issue is whether a total Internet ban imposed on a CSL offender was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. Richard C. CrandonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Daniel VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- BRENDA TAYLOR VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- BRIAN NAMETKO VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- C.A.L. v. State of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2026
- C.D.R. VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (STATE PAROLE BOARD) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- HERU HEKSHUS ATUM-RA VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.