Herbert G. Martin, Inc. v. Alperstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Codefendants Mullins, Torre, Sussman and Hudson River Yards Corporation, by way of cross claims, also seek foreclosure of liens. Order modified by striking out the denial of the motion of defendants Alperstein to dismiss, for insufficiency, the complaint and the cross claims of the foregoing codefendants as against them, and by providing in lieu thereof that the motion be granted. As so modified the order, insofar as appealed' from, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants. It was incumbent upon the lienors, in order to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Larkin v. . McMullinNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hollister v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Herrmann Grace v. . HillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- George E. Sealy Co. v. Ards Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.