Legal Opinion

People v. Watt

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 2014No. E058212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

A jury convicted defendant, Bryan Alexander Watt, of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a))1 and he was granted probation. He appeals, claiming there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict, the jury was misinstructed and two of his probation terms are invalid. We disagree with his first two contentions, agree with the third, and, therefore, strike the probation terms at issue while affirming the remainder of the judgment. The facts are reported in connection with the first issue discussed.

1. Insufficient Evidence of Knowledge That the Property…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. HendrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. MillsMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. P. DoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Maljanian CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API