Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Jorge Anaya Castro

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 12, 2006No. 05-16405PublishedCited by 70 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Jose Jorge Anaya-Castro appeals his sentence for illegal reentry into the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Anaya-Cas-tro argues that the district court errone ously denied him a four-level downward departure under the early disposition program, see U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1, because the use of the program in some districts and not others creates sentencing disparities that violate statutory requirements of sentencing and the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. Anaya-Castro also argues that the enhancement of his sentence based on his prior convictions violated the Fifth and Sixth…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. John Kevin TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States v. Damon AmedeoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Vega-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. AmbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Jorge MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API