Legal Opinion

RJR Nabisco Holdings Corporations v. Dunn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1994No. 18A04-9401-CV-24PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

The question of first impression here is: where does preferred venue He pursuant to Ind.Trial Rule 75(A)(10), when the plaintiff in a wrongful death action is an estate?

Appellants-defendants, RJR Nabisco Holdings Corporations, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Liggett Group, Inc., Liggett and Meyers, Inc., American Brands, Inc., American To-baceo Co., Loews Corp., Lorillard Corp., The Tobacco Institute, Inc., and The Counsel for Tobaceo Research (collectively Defendants), appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to transfer the case to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grove v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Diesel Const. Co., Inc. v. CottenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Dowdy v. FranklinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  4. Charlotton v. GordonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. Key Benefit Administrators, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. RJR Nabisco Holdings, Corp. v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. American Family Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. American Family Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API