Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Consolidated Edison Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Ferraro, J.

Plaintiffs maintain this application for a preliminary injunction mandating restoration of gas and electric service to their premises during the pendency of this action.

The action is for a permanent injunction mandating continuation of such service and for a judgment declaring that Con Edison’s refusal to supply utilities contravenes the Transportation Corporations Law. A judgment is also sought declaring that the remaining defendants have failed to fulfill their duty in supplying the necessary funds for gas and electric service pursuant to the Social Services Law.

Plaintiffs receive grants of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albini v. Solork AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Dworman v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Rivera v. BergerNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Clark v. Utica Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montalvo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API