Legal Opinion

Young v. Sartor

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 27, 1922No. 23668PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiffs allege that they bought a certain rice plantation from defendants under a representation that said plantation had sufficient timber upon it to supply the pumping machine for at least 10 years; that in point of fact the timber on said plantation had previously been sold; wherefore they claim $5,450 damages.

The defense is that, on the contrary, plaintiffs were informed that the timber had been sold; and, moreover, that said sale had been duly registered according to law.

In point of fact the sale of the timber had been registered, but plaintiffs had not searched the record; but the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Zapata Development Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Spillman v. Gasco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Richmond v. Zapata Development Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. Clifton HeirsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Long v. GrishamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API