Young v. Sartor
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
Plaintiffs allege that they bought a certain rice plantation from defendants under a representation that said plantation had sufficient timber upon it to supply the pumping machine for at least 10 years; that in point of fact the timber on said plantation had previously been sold; wherefore they claim $5,450 damages.
The defense is that, on the contrary, plaintiffs were informed that the timber had been sold; and, moreover, that said sale had been duly registered according to law.
In point of fact the sale of the timber had been registered, but plaintiffs had not searched the record; but the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Richmond v. Zapata Development Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Spillman v. Gasco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Richmond v. Zapata Development Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. Clifton HeirsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Long v. GrishamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.