Legal Opinion
In re Blakey
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold L. Galloway, J.
In this Mental Hygiene Law article. 81 proceeding all parties agree that a guardian for the person and property is necessary and proper. The alleged incompetent person (AIP), who is blind and mentally disabled, is presently under the care of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities (OMRDD) and residing in a foster home in Monroe County. This application specifically includes a request for the establishment of a supplemental needs trust for the AIP, which requires the appointment of a guardian. Supplemental needs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gordon v. Village of Monticello, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Thomasel v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dumbleton v. ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mtr. of Shah (Helen Hayes Hosp.)New York Court of Appeals · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Opp v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Opp v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002