Dorsey v. Clements
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentParker, J.
The words in the lease, “timber suitable for turpentine purposes,” are not ambiguous in my opinion, and the expression means all the timber suitable at the date of the instrument for the purposes indicated. See Carter & Elliott v. Williamson & Co., 106 Ga. 280 (supra); McRae v. Stillwell, 111 Ga. 65 (36 S. E. 604, 55 L. R. A. 513); Martin v. Peddy, 120 Ga. 1079 (48 S. E. 420); Allison v. Wall, 121 Ga. 822 (6) (49 S. E. 831); McRae v. Smith, 164 Ga. 23 (4) (137 S. E. 390). “Turpentine timber” has not only a provincial but also a general meaning. Ellis v. State, 67 Ga. App. 821, 828 (21 S. E.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McRae v. Stillwell, Millen & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- McRae v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Allison v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Shaw v. FenderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.