Legal Opinion

State v. Lotegano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 21, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum by

Parker, J.

The case is submitted on briefs. The brief for plaintiff in error bears the name of a member of the bar who is a counselor-at-law, but who signs simply as attorney of record. Apart from this, we have not found it necessary, nor indeed possible, to go into the merits, because the case does not show any judgment of the Supreme Court, nor any writ of error out of this court, nor any assignment of error in this court.

Consequently there is nothing for us to review; and the writ of error — if there be one — is accordingly dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Parker,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. State v. RodriguezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API