Legal Opinion

In re Shipman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2018No. 16-0607PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This mandamus petition arises out of a discovery dispute. Specifically, the real party in interest suspects that the relator is unable or unwilling to diligently search his computer for responsive documents. On the real party's motion, the trial court ordered the relator to turn over his computer and other electronic devices for forensic examination. We conditionally grant mandamus relief and order the trial court to vacate its order.

I

Relator Marion Shipman partnered with Mark and Jamie Shelton in various real-estate ventures and auto dealerships in the 1990s and 2000s. According to Shipman,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. in Re National Lloyds Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. in Re Methodist Primary Care Group & TMH Physician Organization, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  2. Wichita County, Texas v. Environmental Engineering & Geotechnics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
  3. In Re 4X Industrial, LLC, Frank Thielen, and Esteban Ruiz v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
  4. In Re Bertha Arce, Relator v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025
  5. In Re Bright Health Management, Inc. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API