Legal Opinion
Christopher R. Fitzgerald v. Dave Handy, et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 28, 2026No. 3:26-cv-05855Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CHRISTOPHER R. FITZGERALD, CASE NO. 3:26-CV-5855-BHS-DWC 11 Plaintiff, v. ORDER DECLINING SERVICE 12 DAVE HANDY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Christopher R. Fitzgerald, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 16 civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having reviewed and screened Plaintiff’s Complaint 17 under 28 U.S.C. §1915A, the Court declines to serve the Complaint but provides Plaintiff leave 18 to file an amended pleading by September 30, 2026, to cure the deficiencies…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.