Roller v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
We allow employer’s petition for reconsideration in order to amplify the basis for our original opinion, Roller v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 67 Or App 583, 679 P2d 341 (1984), and, with that amplification, we adhere to that opinion.
Employer’s “partial denial” here was, in effect, an attempt to effect an employer closure, which is authorized by ORS 656.268(3). As we pointed out in our opinion, however, employer treated its “partial denial” as just that, not as a closure, and it did not comply with the notice provisions required by the statute for employer-insurer closures. The procedures are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Roller v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Airlines, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Evanite Fiber Corp. v. StriplinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Matter of Compensation of CowartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Guerrero v. Stayton Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Chaffee v. NoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.