State v. Milotte

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 616 (AC 26217), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court properly granted the defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from a warrantless investigatory stop of his vehicle, on the ground that the police officer lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify the stop?”

Martin Zeldis, public defender, in opposition. Decided June 29, 2006