Legal Opinion

Norton v. Dosek

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1955No. 33847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The object of this litigation is to have it determined that a conveyance made by appellee to Edward A. Dosek, although absolute in form, was intended to be and was in substance and legal effect a mortgage; to have the amount due upon the indebtedness evidenced by the note and secured by the conveyance and the person to whom it should be paid decided and to permit appellee to redeem the land by payment of the amount thereof; to have the mortgages placed on the land by Edward A. Dosek adjudged not to be liens on it; and to quiet the title to the land in appellee.

The contesting parties to this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elmcreek Ditch Co. v. St. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Shepardson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State Bank v. MathewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Winkelmann v. LuebbeNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. O'Hanlon v. BarryNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clouse v. County of DawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Davison v. InselmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Norton v. DosekNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. O'Neill Production Credit Ass'n v. Putnam Ranches, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API