Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Krogstad

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 1978No. 77-1573PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VanARTSDALEN, District Judge.

I

The defendant, Edward Krogstad (Krogstad), president and majority shareholder of Power Flow, Inc. (Power Flow), 1 was charged with conspiracy, falsifying federal quarterly employer tax returns, and causing, aiding and abetting a federal internal revenue agent to submit a false audit report, all in regard to Power Flow’s 1969 and 1970 employer tax returns. Count I of the indictment charged Krogstad, Joseph Vetere (Vetere), an accountant, and Emmett F. Diehl (Diehl), an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent, with conspiracy in violation of 18…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Jack MekjianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. James GiulianoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. United States v. William P. Catena, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Joseph M. McCrane Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. GerhartDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Guy Giovannetti and Nicholas JanisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Warren TylerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Joseph Alexander ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Rafael CorsinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Jairo Hernan PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API