Legal Opinion

Santos v. Caryall Transport

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 13, 1999No. Agency No. 96-01407 CA A99312PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

987 P.2d 1271 (1999)

163 Or. App. 414

In the Matter of the Compensation of Benjamin G. Santos, Claimant.

Benjamin G. SANTOS, Petitioner,

v.

CARYALL TRANSPORT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

(Agency No. 96-01407; CA A99312)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 27, 1998.

Decided October 13, 1999.

Merrill Schneider, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Donald M. Hooton and Schneider, Hooton.

David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge,[*] and ARMSTRONG, Judge.

2Per curiam

Reversed and…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowder v. AlumaflexCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. SAIF Corp. v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. SAIF Corp. v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API