In re Raymond W.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Confronted as we are with an affirmed factual determination that appellant’s confession was given voluntarily, we cannot conclude on this record that it was involuntary as a matter of law.
We do take occasion, nonetheless, to make a further observation. However extensive may be a parent’s right and a minor child’s entitlement to the exercise of the responsibilities *441of parental guidance and influence (an issue which we identify but do not now address or determine), if it be established that such guidance or influence is not exercised by the parent independently but at the…
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hughes v. Sun Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883
- Leonosio v. BartilinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895