Legal Opinion

Hohenstein v. Hohenstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leon A. Beerman, J.

Defendant Walter Hohenstein moves for an order vacating and setting aside the plaintiff Selma Hohenstein’s demand for a bill of particulars and for a protective order limiting the deposition by striking from the notice the provisions requiring defendant, Walter Hohenstein, to produce upon deposition such books and papers as are more fully listed in plaintiffs Selma Hohenstein’s and Roslyn Weinstein’s notice. The plaintiffs are grandmother and granddaughter, respectively.

Plaintiffs, Selma Hohenstein and Roslyn Weinstein, cross-move for an order striking…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ian v. WassbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Burns v. 500 East 83rd Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Burns v. BurnsNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jeruchimowitz v. JeruchimowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Novack v. 50 Plaza Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API