Commonwealth v. Martinez
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Justice.
On January 16, 1975, following a trial by jury, appellant was found guilty of murder of the third degree and aggra*334vated assault. Post-verdict motions were filed and denied, and concurrent sentences of seven and one-half to fifteen years on the murder charge, and two and one-half to five years on the aggravated assault charge, were imposed. This appeal followed. We affirm.
I
We deal initially with appellant’s objections to the trial court’s pre-trial rulings. First, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to strike the array of petit jurors.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. YountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. PetrakovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. PressleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. CocciolettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.