Otto v. PRUDENTIAL PROP. & CAS.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
278 N.J. Super. 176 (1994)
650 A.2d 832
JOYCE OTTO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 25, 1994.
Decided December 21, 1994.
Before Judges BRODY, LONG and LEVY.
Randi S. Greenberg, argued the cause for appellant (Robert A. Auerbach, attorney; Randi S. Greenberg, of counsel and on the brief).
Robert F. Rupinski, argued the cause for respondent (Schulze and Rupinski, attorneys; Mr. Rupinski, on the brief).
LEVY, J.A.D.
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff sought to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pickett v. Lloyd'sSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- IFA Ins. Co. v. WaittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alpert, Goldberg v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Licensed Beverage Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- David v. Government Employees Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Knox v. Lincoln General InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Fernandez v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.