Legal Opinion

Beneby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 2004No. 4D04-3159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the summary denial of defendant Feliciano Beneby’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion was denied without prejudice to resubmit it within thirty days, adding factual allegations demonstrating that the alleged deficiencies of Beneby’s trial counsel prejudiced him.

In order to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, movants must show that their counsel’s performance was deficient and that there is a reasonable probability that counsel’s deficient performance affected the outcome of the proceeding. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Kleppinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Snipes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API