Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Ass'n v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.
I agree with the majority that the workplace tobacco use provision of the interest arbitration award (Award) does not require that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth) violate section 701 of the Public Employe Relations Act (PERA).1 However, I disagree that: (1) the Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Association (Association) waived its challenge to the Award’s increase in the retiree contribution rate for health care benefits;2 and (2) the Award’s failure to include arbitration as the final step in the procedure for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Appeal of Upper Providence Police Delaware County Lodge 27Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- City of Wilkes-Barre v. City of Wilkes-Barre Police Benevolent Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Borough of Dormont v. Dormont Borough Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lee v. Municipality of Bethel ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.