Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Lange

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1967No. File 10311Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBiegelmeier, Judge

I

I cannot concur in the part of the opinion which holds the information is insufficient to charge manslaughter in the first degree. The majority opinion cites State v. Belt, 1961, 79 S.D. 324, 111 N.W.2d 588, and while it may not be the intention to overrule it as that opinion dealt with a murder charge (SDC 13.2007) and this offense is first degree manslaughter (SDC 13.2013), it appears to me that the same principle is involved. In Belt the charge of murder stated that on a date certain defendant did "unlawfully, feloniously, wilfully and with malice aforethought, murder a human being, Earl…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BeltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. HubbardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. BallardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. EdmundsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. OttoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API