Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Delaney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated February 24, 1998, as (1) denied those branches of their motion which were for leave to enter a judgment against the defendants South Bay Water Taxi and John Sanders upon their default in answering the complaint, and to have the matter set down for an inquest, and (2) granted the cross motion of the defendants South Bay Water Taxi and John Sanders to compel the plaintiffs to accept their answer.

Ordered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. I.J. Handa, P. C. v. ImperatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Albin v. First Nationwide Network Mortgage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Mondrone v. Lakeview Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Van Man Adhesives Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Goodman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Drake v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Nikac v. RukajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Dyno v. HillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Finkelstein v. SunshineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API