Legal Opinion

Hanner v. Hanner

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1964No. 7005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Vice Chief Justice:

Arthur E. Hanner sued Josephine E. Hanner for divorce. By stipulation of the parties a Master was appointed under Rule 53, Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R. S. After a lengthy trial, the lower court granted a “Brown” decree and divided the community property. Defendant appeals and makes numerous assignments of error. However, these assignments of error apply to four points: the validity of the reconciliation agreement, the division of the community property, the assessment of the master’s fees, and the weight of the evidence.

The facts are as follows: At the time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tyson v. TysonArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Fisher v. KoontzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Matlow v. MatlowArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Moayon v. MoayonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lee v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Dunbar v. DunbarArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wick v. WickArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Knight v. DeMarcusArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Finck v. FinckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API