Legal Opinion

McKone v. Hogan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1916No. 6484PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by S. W. Hogan against Isabella A. McKone and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was commenced Tby S. W. Hogan, the defendant in error, against Isabella A. McKone and Roger McKone, the plaintiffs in error, to recover upon a note and foreclose a mortgage given on real estate to secure the payment of this note. A trial was had to the court without a jury, which resulted in a judgment for the amount prayed for and a decree of foreclosure.

The plaintiffs in error attempted to appeal from This judgment and decree; but the record shows upon its ■face that there were three exhibits- introduced' and admitted in evidence, over the objection of the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API