Legal Opinion

Hamby v. Hamby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1959No. 37692Published

1Opinion of the Court

99 Ga. App. 808 (1959)

110 S.E.2d 133

HAMBY

v.

HAMBY.

37692.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided June 24, 1959.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1959.

Charles A. Pannell, Pittman, Kinney & Pope, H. C. Kinney, for plaintiff in error.

J. Paxson Amis, James Maddox, contra.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

1. The defendant in error, in this opinion referred to as the plaintiff, makes the point that on the trial there was no motion for directed verdict, and that the failure to make the motion constituted a waiver of the right of the defendant to insist on the ground "that the verdict was without evidence to support it." The Federal…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Nichols; Concurrence · Felton.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Miller v. FairleyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Vecchio v. VecchioOhio Supreme Court · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API