Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People ex rel. Whitman v. Woodward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1912Published

Application for an absolute writ of prohibition.

1Concurrence

Laughlin, J. (concurring):

The petition to this court for the writ of prohibition showed presumptively that the Appellate Division in the Second Department, wherein the special proceeding sought to be prohibited originated, was not in session. It is certified in the return of Mr. Justice Woodward that that court was in session. On the issue thus presented, the material facts have been formally stipulated, and it is thus shown that the Appellate Division in the Second Department, on the day when the application was made to this court for the writ, was in recess; that the court on that day…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re GannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Commonwealth v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API