Legal Opinion

Curtis B. Perry Laura L. Perry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1996No. 94-70817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

We are asked to consider the application of I.R.C. section 1034 to property relinquished in a divorce settlement. The tax court determined that a taxpayer could not defer recog nition of gain from the sale of his former marital residence. The taxpayer had vacated the property permanently, intending never to return, pursuant to a divorce settlement which gave his former wife an exclusive right of occupancy. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482, and affirm.

I

Petitioner Curtis B. Perry lived with his former wife for five years in their Irvine, California…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stolk v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  2. Bayley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  3. Clapham v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Houlette v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Dwyer v. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Houghton Lake Area Tourism & Convention Bureau v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API