Curtis B. Perry Laura L. Perry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to consider the application of I.R.C. section 1034 to property relinquished in a divorce settlement. The tax court determined that a taxpayer could not defer recog nition of gain from the sale of his former marital residence. The taxpayer had vacated the property permanently, intending never to return, pursuant to a divorce settlement which gave his former wife an exclusive right of occupancy. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482, and affirm.
I
Petitioner Curtis B. Perry lived with his former wife for five years in their Irvine, California…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stolk v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Bayley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Clapham v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Houlette v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
- Dwyer v. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Houghton Lake Area Tourism & Convention Bureau v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003