Legal Opinion
In Re Pusey and Jones Corporation
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 23, 1961No. 1705PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Senior District Judge.
1. Deemer contends that the “six-months’ rule” which had its origin in the railroad receivership cases, 1 should be and has been extended to private corporations. To support this contention, it relies upon the rule of In re Columbia Ribbon Co., 2 reasserted by this Court in Wilmington Speedway Inc., 3 the cases of Dudley v. Mealey 4 and Diamond State Motor Freight, Inc., 5 6and Collier on Bankruptcy, (14 ed.) § 9.13 [5].' 6 The cited authority does not, upon analysis, provide the desired support. The rule of Columbia Ribbon Co. involves the priority of expenses…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In Re Columbia Ribbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Dudley v. MealeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Bowen v. HockleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Chicago Express, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- In the Matter of the Pusey and Jones Corporation, Bankrupt. Deemer Steel Casting Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- In Re North Atlantic and Gulf Steamship Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- In the Matter of Hallmark Medical Services, Inc., Debtors. Isaac Mizrahi v. William H. Martin, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- In Re Joe Newcomer Finance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.