Legal Opinion

Tres Palacios Rice & Irrigation Co. v. Eidman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1906PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Matagorda County. Tried below before Hon. W. C. Carpenter, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

GILL, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by H. B. and S. O. Eidman to recover of the appellant irrigation company damages for breach of contract to furnish Avater for the irrigation of a rice crop planted by the Eidmans in 1903. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, and the company prosecuted this appeal.

THe plaintiffs’ cause of action as stated in the petition is, in substance, as follows:

It was averred that the defendant company leased 120 acres of irrigable land to plaintiffs to be planted in rice during the year 1903. That it was a corporation organized for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Texas Banking & Insurance v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Collins & Douglas v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Texas Banking & Insurance v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Walker v. MarchbanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Abilene & S. Ry. Co. v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Tarver, Steele & Co. v. Pendleton Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Union Producing Company v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. BolesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API