Legal Opinion

J. R. Watkins Co. v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1946No. 32211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, V.C.J.

Plaintiff, the J. R. Watkins Company, sued defendant, D. P. Chapman, the guarantor upon a contract of ' sale entered into between plaintiff and one of its salesmen, Claude Bebout, to recover the price of goods sold to Bebout thereunder. The jury returned a general verdict for defendant, and from the judgment entered thereon, plaintiff appeals. Save for the question of whether the court erroneously refused to extend the time in which to make and serve the case-made (which is brought before us by bill of exceptions) the appeal is by transcript.

1. Plaintiff first contends that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Central Surety Ins. Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Van Horn v. Van HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Sanderson v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Morgan v. Galilean Health Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Morgan v. Galilean Health Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API