Legal Opinion

Joint Board of Control of the Flathead, Mission & Jocko Irrigation Districts v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1988No. 87-4106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff/Appellant the Joint Board of Control of the Flathead, Mission and Jocko Irrigation Districts (“Joint Board”) filed an action in the district court for injunctive relief from operating procedures adopted by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”), an agency within the Department of the Interior, to regulate instream flow and reservoir pool levels on the waters administered by the Flathead Irrigation and Power Project (“FIPP”), an agency within the BIA. Intervenor-Defendant/Appellee the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation (“Tribes”)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. CBS Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. In Re Motion to Compel Filed by Dudley M. Steele, Jr. And Betty L. Kruger, United States of America v. Dudley M. Steele, Jr. And Betty L. KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Donald P. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joint Board Of Control Of The Flathead, Mission And Jocko Irrigation Districts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Goral v. DartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API