Legal Opinion
State v. Condrick
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 27, 1984No. 83-027PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The Vermont District Court, Unit No. 5, Washington Circuit, found defendant to be a person in need of treatment and, pursuant to the involuntary treatment provisions of 13 V.S.A. §§ 4814-4822, ordered defendant committed to the care and custody of the Commissioner of Mental Health for a period of 90 days. The order of the district court is vacated.
Defendant was originally charged with a violation of 13 V.S.A. § 3701, entitled “Unlawful mischief.” While residing at a group home, he was apprehended in the act of vandalizing an automobile by throwing a porcelain toilet bowl through the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re John Ballay, A/K/A Figeret Hoxha, PatientCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- State v. LodgeTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- In re Mental Health of D. B. W.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Proctor v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re P.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- H. Brooke Paige v. State of Vermont, Secretary of State James Condos, Attorney General William Sorrell, Rafael Edward Cruz and Marco Antonio RubioSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. J.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In re S.N.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.