Legal Opinion

Sterling Bag Co. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.

This is a motion by defendants for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

The action is brought against the city of New York, the comptroller and the collector for a declaratory judgment that the New York city sales tax, Local Law No. 20 (published as Local Law No. 21) of the year 1934, p. 143, as amended by Local Law No. 24 (published as No. 25) of the same year, p. 164; re-enacted by Local Law No. 29 of 1935, Local Law No. 31 of 1936, and Local Law No. 20 of 1937, does not apply to sales by plaintiff of burlap and cotton bags to sugar refiners in the city of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Endurance Holding Corp. v. Kramer Surgical Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Hurwitz v. HurwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Ryder v. PyrkeNew York Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Empire City Subway Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Sterling Bag Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API